@InProceedings{CastroBezeVonRVonR:2023:GrPrPr,
author = "Castro, Aline Anderson de and Bezerra, Francisco Gilney Silva and
Von Randow, Rita and Von Randow, Celso",
affiliation = "{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto
Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de
Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas
Espaciais (INPE)}",
title = "Gross Primary Productivity heterogeneity in the Amazon forest and
possible vulnerabilities to climate change",
booktitle = "Proceedings...",
year = "2023",
organization = "AGU FAll Meeting",
publisher = "AGU",
abstract = "Brazil concentrates in the Amazon biome its main emissions
associated with deforestation and forest degradation, but also
possible sinks through the natural forest. This study focuses on
understanding this sink role and the factors that determine
resilience or vulnerability of the biome to future climate change.
To achieve this, we used Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) obtained
by the GOSIF Gross Primary Productivity based on OCO-SIF, MODIS
remote sensing data as a forest productivity proxy. We applied
k-means clustering method to classify regions according to the
annual mean GPP and also to its amplitude (difference between
maximum and minimum monthly mean) in natural forest. For each
cluster, we evaluated the main atmospheric data that can explain
the GPP using linear regression over a set of variables obtained
from ERA5-Land reanalysis data. To remove deforested areas, we
classified the 2020 Pan-Amazonian land cover Mapbiomas data as
natural or non-natural areas to produce a mask of only natural
areas. The main conditions found as GPP explanatory variables, as
expected, are evaporation, solar radiation, precipitation, and
soil related, such as heat flux, soil water content and
temperature and albedo. Either clustering by the annual mean or by
the annual amplitude, the central Amazon appears mainly influenced
by forest evaporation, while the southern areas are more
influenced by the soil properties. Precipitation is a relevant
driver in the southwestern and eastern areas, together with solar
radiation. The main difference between the two clustering methods
was found in the northwestern areas, where the clustering based on
mean GPP is related to evaporation and the clustering based on GPP
amplitude shows a stronger influence of the radiation and, to a
lesser extent, surface runoff and relative humidity. The next step
is to include other ecological or physiological factors in the GPP
distribution over the Amazon Basin, to find out if there are any
particularities in the main drivers (meteorological and/or
ecological) of GPP variability in different areas of the amazon.",
conference-location = "San Francisco, CA",
conference-year = "11-15 Dec. 2023",
language = "en",
urlaccessdate = "28 abr. 2024"
}